Thread:ShockwaveDude120/@comment-24374939-20161214125705/@comment-24097388-20161214231606

DarkUnknownWarrior wrote: ShockwaveDude120 wrote: DarkUnknownWarrior wrote: ShockwaveDude120 wrote: DarkUnknownWarrior wrote: ShockwaveDude120 wrote: DarkUnknownWarrior wrote: I'm goona explain why did we took Hack. Available right now.

EDIT: Just to be clear though, I'm not going to be much active, due to school exams coming up for me. So it's best we either do this here, or plan the time for the chat. Okay.. i''ll just write you here: We tooked TheHack, becuase we're getting two new admins, meaning two old ones are getting taken down, TheHack and Ghost got taken down that's the whole story. '' I can understand taking down Ghost, due to his lack of activity and that he was a regular user like everyone else, but why Hack? He's the founder of the wiki and has every right to stay as admin. Otherwise, I don't see why Explicit still has his admin rights, especially when he retired. Hack last time edited in June, And Explicit said he might come back, as i said before, two admins terminated, new two admins added. Explicit said he would check the wiki from time to time, only to see how things are doing. Never did he say he would return as admin. He's retired after all. And just becase the founder of the wiki hasn't edited since June still does not mean his rights as admin should be taken away.

Did you talk to MaZano about this? He should know about this and share his thoughts. So what if he is the founder of the wiki?. there are loads of wikia's that the founders aren't Admins anymore. And I'm assuming that's because they chose to leave their rights and retire from Wikia entirely, not because another admin randomly took away their rights, especially without notifying them.

Either way, that's something you can't just suddenly do, without discussing it with the mods and admins.